Jonathan Kamm (kammagic) Exposed

Kelan · 10-03-2011, 12:48 AM

Sorry, about bumping the thread guys, but Jonathan has seem to strike again =0

I commented on his "Middle School Magic" video saying something along the lines of "Great performance but I did feel the card to wallet was a little rushed. But excellent performance". (I really did like it, I just felt the need to comment about how he rushed the effect) This, to me, in no way, shape, or form violates his "rules" of allowing you to comment on his videos. Which are right here:

(1. I listen to everyone (I don't ignore anyone)
2. I judge the advice first by itself. Is it good or bad advice? Using my 25 years experience usually this is quite clear.
3. If I'm on the fence or don't understand the advice I start looking at criteria.
4. Where did they get the info? Why do they think this is good advice? What do they know about the topic? I will ask a battery of questions if I don't understand the advice.
5. If the advice is something they really know about they will have no
problem answering my questions. If it's something they read or heard somewhere. They will have trouble answering my questions.
6. It may only take one answer to a question for me to realize this guy knows what he is talking about or one answer to know he doesn't.
7. I will ask questions until I have enough information to make an intelligent decision regarding the advice.)

I even discussed this with Mark on MSN, Mark first mentioning it to me and me realizing that is was true (at least, in our opinions of course. Your guys' might be different). The only shred of reasoning Jonathan might have is me (and Mark) "Violating" "rule" number 2. Apparently, his 25 years of experience thought this was "bad advice". What do you guys think of this?

EDIT: Also, what is not impromptu about the following trick? Jonathan told me it is not impromptu.

Sorry about the audio being out of sync- it was made with my webcam :P

10-03-2011, 12:48 AM	#1
Kelan kittydakat Join Date: May 2011 Location: USA Posts: 142	Sorry, about bumping the thread guys, but Jonathan has seem to strike again =0 I commented on his "Middle School Magic" video saying something along the lines of "Great performance but I did feel the card to wallet was a little rushed. But excellent performance". (I really did like it, I just felt the need to comment about how he rushed the effect) This, to me, in no way, shape, or form violates his "rules" of allowing you to comment on his videos. Which are right here: (1. I listen to everyone (I don't ignore anyone) 2. I judge the advice first by itself. Is it good or bad advice? Using my 25 years experience usually this is quite clear. 3. If I'm on the fence or don't understand the advice I start looking at criteria. 4. Where did they get the info? Why do they think this is good advice? What do they know about the topic? I will ask a battery of questions if I don't understand the advice. 5. If the advice is something they really know about they will have no problem answering my questions. If it's something they read or heard somewhere. They will have trouble answering my questions. 6. It may only take one answer to a question for me to realize this guy knows what he is talking about or one answer to know he doesn't. 7. I will ask questions until I have enough information to make an intelligent decision regarding the advice.) I even discussed this with Mark on MSN, Mark first mentioning it to me and me realizing that is was true (at least, in our opinions of course. Your guys' might be different). The only shred of reasoning Jonathan might have is me (and Mark) "Violating" "rule" number 2. Apparently, his 25 years of experience thought this was "bad advice". What do you guys think of this? EDIT: Also, what is not impromptu about the following trick? Jonathan told me it is not impromptu. Sorry about the audio being out of sync- it was made with my webcam :P