Jonathan Kamm (kammagic) Exposed

[kammagic]

It is not possible that every comment I made is wrong yet you just disagreed with everything I said. This shows me that your goal was simply to disagree and not give an honest answer.
Also I'm telling you how I feel.I felt insulted by the things I mentioned. They are my personal feelings which you asked me for. You telling me they were not insults does not make them any less hurtful. You can't tell someone how they feel. Just disagreeing with everything someone says is no way to communicate. I think Rich would tell you that.

---------- Post added at 06:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Mark

You can't say that Vincent's use of the word 'lift' was exposure and then say that 'DL' isn't exposure. 'DL' is semi-exposure because every magician knows what it means yet spectators don't. If a magician asks you how something was done and you just say "(it's a) DL" they don't need further explanation and so it is exposure. The word 'lift' isn't because it's exactly what everyone is seeing: you lifting a card.

The word was "Double lift" vs. DL. I only care about exposure to layman. Any competent magician should be able to figure out any magic effect by watching a video performance. I don't care about exposure to a magician. Layman do not know DL but they do know what double lift means. So I was correct in double lift being exposure and DL not. But it doesn't matter because we already talked about comments having no value to people watching a video. If the comments made a difference then nobody would dislike my videos because all my comments are positive. Comments don't influence you guys. Even with all my positives you guys still dislike my videos. So I guess you guys don't let comments influence you either. Thank you for proving my point.

You are the only one who openly exposed it in this thread and on YouTube by selling tutorials for it which you named the way everyone considers it to be exposure. Your ACR even has an annotation over the entire video which links to it and with you telling that you used it in the video. And if you search for the keywords 'double lift' in your video search engine it even shows the ACR between all the tutorials you sell. A lot of exposure going on there. Are you sure you don't support it?
You really can't tell me what I think exposure is. I don't want it in my comment section but I don't mind it in the tags. No layman will look there. Why is it I don't care what your views on exposure are but you seem to be very aggressive about telling me what I should think exposure is.You have no right telling me what to think.But it does show what kind of person you are. Your true colors are shining through.


We thought this was the only correct forum to post this kind of thread in. Reason is that it wasn't all that different from the other threads in this forum. Richard originally decided to post this in the 'General Discussions' or 'Public Magic Discussions'. Another Admin then moved it to this more proper place with our approval which in the end meant that the forum name had to be changed as it was slightly too negative as mentioned in the beginning of this thread.

You say Richard insulted you in his post. Can you please list some of the insults so we can see what exactly you were insulted by? Thanks.

Jonathan Kamm